Archive for the ‘Real Estate’ Category

Low inventory levels set stage for heated Spring market in most major Canadian centres, says RE/MAX

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Active listings down in 81 per cent of markets in January

Lack of inventory will be the greatest challenge facing housing markets across the country this Spring, according to a report released by RE/MAX.

The RE/MAX Market Trends Report 2010, which examined real estate trends and developments in 16markets across the country, found that unusually strong activity during one of the traditionally quietest months of the year has led to a sharp decline in active listings in 81 per cent of markets surveyed. The threat of higher interest rates, tighter lending criteria, and in British Columbia and Ontario, the introduction of the new Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) have clearly served to kick-start real estate activity from coast-to-coast, prompting an unprecedented influx of purchasers. As a result, 87.5 per cent of markets posted an increase in sales in January. Average price appreciated in 81 per cent of markets surveyed.

Affordability is the catalyst for the vast majority of purchasers in today’s housing market. While homeownership is still within reach in many major centres, levels are slipping. There is a growing sense, on both sides of the fence, that the time to act is now.

Markets experiencing the tightest inventory levels include Toronto (- 41 per cent); Kitchener-Waterloo (-33 per cent); Ottawa (- 30 per cent); Victoria (- 30 per cent); Greater Vancouver (- 27 per cent); Halifax- Dartmouth (- 19 per cent); London-St. Thomas (- 18 per cent); Regina (- 16 per cent); and Winnipeg (- 13 per cent). Conditions were still balanced, but starting to tighten in Calgary, Edmonton and Saskatoon, particularly in the single-family detached category.

The highest year-over-year sales gains were reported in Greater Vancouver (152 per cent), Kelowna (121 per cent), Greater Toronto (87 per cent), Victoria (69 per cent), Hamilton-Burlington (58 per cent), London-St. Thomas (55 per cent) and Calgary (47 per cent). Western Canadian cities dominated the list of centres with the highest increases in price appreciation. These included Victoria at 25.5 per cent, Kelowna at 22 per cent, Greater Vancouver at 19.5 per cent, and Winnipeg at 17 per cent. St. John’s (23 per cent) and Toronto (19 per cent) were also among the frontrunners for price growth.

There have never been so many motivating factors in play at once. We’re in for a heated Spring market that will, in all probability, spill over into the summer months as the window of opportunity draws to a close. The supply of homes listed for sale has been drastically reduced, housing values are once again on the upswing, and banks and governments are moving in unison toward stricter lending policies.

While buyers are taking advantage of favourable conditions, sellers too are reaping the rewards. Competing bids are a factor in the marketplace once again, with well-priced listings-especially at the entry-level price point-experiencing multiple offers. Properties priced at fair-market value will likely sell quickly for top dollar. The overall pressure on sales and price is significant across the board – and it’s not likely to subside unless more inventory comes on-stream.

The level of frustration is growing, as pent-up demand builds. For every successful offer, there are those that will walk away empty-handed. They’re thrust back into the buyer pool and the process starts all over again. Some buyers are upping the ante, while others are considering alternate housing options. Still, purchasers remain cautious in their bids, with most careful not to max out debt service ratios.

Recent revisions to lending criteria will add fuel to the fire in the short term. Buyers considering a variable rate mortgage will step up their plans for homeownership in the next month or so just to get in under the wire. In the longer term, buyers will adjust, but move forward. Compromise has long been a reality-particularly in the larger centres. This simply means they may go smaller or further in their pursuits.

It’s been a 180 degree turnaround from this time last year. It’s clear that real estate from coast to coast has roared back to life and markets are once again firing on all cylinders. The vast majority of markets are now recovered and fully-evolved, with all segments working in tandem. At the luxury price point, activity was brisk in seventy-three per cent of centres surveyed, with momentum ramping up in the remainder. Opportunity exists in some areas, but the question is for how much longer?

Source: RE/MAX Market Trends 2010

Edmonton Real Estate Statistics – February 22, 2010

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

team-leading-edge-logo

Well we are off to another good week in the Edmonton real estate market, as the market is getting stronger every day.

As of this morning there were 1.669 single family dwellings for sale in Edmonton proper.  That is a slight increase from last weeks inventory level of 1,607.  I expect the inventory to continue to increase as we get closer to spring time.

In the last 30 days there were 517 single family dwellings sold in Edmonton proper.  That also is a slight increase from last weeks level of 478.

To most important and relevant part is our listing to sales ratio… they are dropping.  This week’s ratio is 3.23:1 in comparison to last week’s ratio of 3.36:1.  So two things here are important.  Number one is the fact that the ratio is dropping and showing us a trend.  Number two the ratio is below the 4:1 that we need for a stable or neutral market.

So expect valuations to start rising.  If you are a first time buyer don’t wait call your realtor now and see what your options might be even if you don’t have your down payment.  Also if you are thinking of moving to a bigger or more expensive home again the sooner you make your move the further ahead financially you will be.

Please call me if you have any questions about this, or anything else related to Real Estate. I would love to help you out. (780) 634-8151

Serge Bourgoin founding and managing partner of Team Leading Edge at RE/MAX Elite

Team Leading Edge… Leading the way with extraordinary service

Can Canada avoid a housing bubble?

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Home ownership has become a political — and economic — hot potato. Politicians are handling it with care.

Buying a house is about a great deal more than providing you and your family with permanent shelter or making an investment. Home ownership is one of the most fundamental economic and political pillars of society — which is precisely why the government of Canada is being so terribly careful not to mess with it.

Amid increasingly vocal concerns (from none other than the CEOs of Canada’s chartered banks and former Bank of Canada governor David Dodge) about the possibility of a housing bubble developing in Canada, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has just introduced measures designed to cool the market down — at least a little bit

Because the central bank has committed to keeping interest rates low for the first half of 2010 in order to help stimulate the battered domestic economy, the worry is that Canadians are taking on massive new debt loads that they won’t be able to service when rates eventually rise.

All the latest data from the real estate sector reinforces such fears. According to the Canadian Real Estate Association, existing home sales in January were up 58 per cent from the depths of a year ago. But more critically, prices were up almost 20 per cent in that period to an average of $328, 537. That despite the fact that the economy is hardly blazing and unemployment continues to be a stubborn problem, despite some recent improvements.

All of this led Finance Minister Jim Flaherty — who, as recently as January, insisted he saw no evidence of a housing bubble — to announce some changes to the way that real estate lending is managed in Canada.

As of April 19, there will be some new, standardized criteria for mortgages. But it’s nothing that’s going to drastically affect the affordability of real estate — especially for first-time buyers — this spring. All the changes apply to mortgages backed by government-backed mortgage insurance (from Crown corporation Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation) — a mandatory insurance when a buyer’s down payment is less than 20 per cent.

Here’s a rundown of the new criteria:

  • To qualify for mortgage insurance new borrowers will have to meet the criteria for a five-year, fixed-rate loan rather than just a three-year loan. The borrower doesn’t have to take those terms — although the five-year rate is currently the most popular. It’s just a test to be certain they could still carry that amount of debt against gross income (the acceptable ration is 42 per cent allocated for housing costs from gross income) in the event interest rates pop.
  • Folks who plan to refinance their houses to improve liquidity or eliminate higher cost credit card debt, can now only borrow up to 90 per cent of the value of their home, rather than the previously allowable 95 per cent.
  • Those who buy non-owner-occupied residential rental properties for speculative or investment purposes now have to plop down 20 per cent of the price rather than just five per cent.

In other words, these measures are more about the perception of action than a major credit crackdown. It’s a way for the federal government to flag its concern and to take some proactive measures without really dislocating the real estate market.

At the very most, the careful steps taken by Mr. Flaherty are expected to take some of the heat out of markets where ferocious bidding wars have been steadily driving up prices for houses and condominiums.

It’s part of a gradual process that started in July 2008. Although Mr. Flaherty continues to deny there’s a housing bubble, Ottawa announced back then that CMHC would only insure mortgages when there was at least a five per cent down payment. That basically squeezed out the zero-down loans which often saw purchasers borrow as much as 103 per cent of the value of their house (land transfer and other associated charges were folded into the mortgage).

At the same time, the government stipulated that mortgages could only be amortized over 35 years rather than 40 years. Flaherty is hoping to reverse the sudden increase in 2006 of amortization periods (before this, the long-time standard was 25 years).

For those people like Mr. Dodge, who’s been publicly fretting about the sustainability of the Canadian housing market for at least four years now, Mr. Flaherty’s cautious changes may not be quite as tough as hoped. But that issue brings us to the political heart of the matter.

Being elected is a popularity contest. Maintaining a favourable home buying climate is one of the most important things a government can do to maintain that popularity. Nothing says we’re working on your behalf like voters who are able to live their dreams.

It’s also conventional wisdom that home ownership is good for both a society and an economy. People who own homes are considered to be more stable and more politically engaged — they are more likely to feel like stakeholders in their communities. Which means they vote, pay taxes and generally get involved in positive things.

Home ownership also means that there is a reliable, fixed workforce available for businesses. And homeowners are the consumers who are constantly spending the money that makes GDP go round — for appliances, furniture, home renovations and so on.

All of this — along with a remarkably resilient period of general economic prosperity — has led to a pretty deeply-ingrained set of expectations around housing. In North America, there’s not much question that home ownership has come to be viewed as an inalienable right.

Because politicians – and governmental institutions like CMHC — are among those who’ve encouraged that fundamental sense of entitlement, they have to be very careful not to rock the boat — especially when conditions are already choppy. For that reason, Mr. Flaherty has borrowed a page from central bankers’ playbook and he’s essentially trying to “jawbone” the housing market into cooling down rather than taking more Draconian steps.

Let’s hope it works before Canadians hear the loud popping noise that confirms a real estate bubble not only existed, it’s now exploded.

Source: MSN Money – By Deirdre McMurdy, February 19, 2010

Owners want cozier homes in 2010

Friday, February 19th, 2010

1c4d2a974b94bcc49ba87c47d325

Planning on building, buying or improving your home this year? Chances are you’re thinking smaller, smarter and more family-centric.

“We continue to see a ‘cents and sensibilities’ approach when it comes to buying or improving a home, said Eliot Nusbaum, Better Homes and Gardens‘ executive editor for home design.

Nusbaum made the comment while presenting the results of the magazine’s Next Home Survey at the National Association of Home Builders’ International Builders Show in Las Vegas last month.

Price, energy-efficiency, organization and comfort are top priorities of potential new home buyers and homeowners who are planning improvements in the next few months, he said.

“Today’s homeowner is also looking for a home that fits the entire family-from a multi-tasking home office, to expanded storage space, to a living room that can adapt to advancements in home entertainment and technology,” said Nusbaum.

Later, speaking by phone from his office in Des Moines, Iowa, he said: “When someone says their highest priority is an efficient HVAC system, you know we’re not living the same dream as three years ago. That dream was having a showplace home-a McMansion with the emphasis on two stories, big public spaces and an expensive fit-and-finish kitchen.

“Now, those things have drifted to the back burner. Today it’s ‘what I need’ versus ‘what I want.’ People are being sensible and practical. They want low-cost improvements that pack a big punch,” he said.

There were no major surprises in the survey results, “Though I thought it was interesting the number of people-85 per cent-who expressed a desire to have a separate laundry.”

And Nusbaum was mildly surprised that 70 per cent of those surveyed wanted low-maintenance landscaping, “when gardening is supposed to be America’s top hobby.”

NEW-HOME TRENDS

Here are some of the results of Better Homes and Gardens’ Next Home Survey, and some of the trends that may influence new-home building and home-improvement projects in 2010:

87 per cent of respondents said a greener, more-energy efficient home is a priority.

68 per cent wanted an outdoor grilling and living area.

59 per cent wanted a home office.

36 per cent said their next home would be “somewhat smaller” or “much smaller.”

75 per cent said the economy has impacted their home-improvement plans.

52 per cent said now is the time to spend on needed repairs and maintenance, rather than major home-improvement projects.

Source: Better Homes and Gardens

Why Jim Flaherty’s mortgage rules won’t hurt homebuyers

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

keyshands

This won’t hurt a bit, homebuyers.

The mortgage rule changes announced Tuesday by Financial Minister Jim Flaherty will weigh a bit on real estate speculators and heavily indebted people who want to fold their high-rate credit card debt into a lower-rate mortgage. But for rank and file homebuyers, the changes will barely be perceptible when they take effect on April 19.

“This should have a limited impact on what I see daily,” mortgage broker Peter Majthenyi said in an e-mail he fired off after Mr. Flaherty’s announcement. “I believe it’s more a message that ‘Big Brother’ is watching and cares.”

Olympics aside, the favourite Canadian diversion of the moment is to debate whether there is a bubble in the housing market. Those most worried about the housing market plunging have urged Mr. Flaherty to raise the minimum down payment for a home and reduce the maximum payback period.

But the 35-year amortization, favourite of first-time buyers across this land, remains. So does the 5-per-cent down payment, which is heavily relied upon in high-cost cities like Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto.

All the measures announced by Mr. Flaherty affect mortgages covered by government-backed mortgage insurance, where the buyer puts less than 20 per cent down. The key change for typical home buyers is that, regardless of what term or type of mortgage they choose, they’ll have to be able to afford the five-year rate.

This is a sensible way of building some slack into the system as we look ahead to a cycle of rising interest rates. If someone chooses a variable-rate mortgage, where the interest rate can be as low as 2 to 2.25 per cent today, they’ll have to be able to handle the payment at the current five-year rate. Right now, the posted rate at the big banks is 5.39 per cent.

You won’t have to actually make the higher payments required by the five-year mortgage. You’ll just have to theoretically be able to carry them and still remain within the limitations lenders set out on how much of your gross income can be consumed by debt (it’s 42 to 44 per cent, just so you know).

Mortgage brokers report that a lot of lenders were already ensuring clients could afford the payments on a three-year mortgage. So bumping up that up to a five-year term will only have a marginal effect.

“Are we going to see the odd borrower have to come up with more money or not buy they house they want? Absolutely,” Mr. Majthenyi said. “But will it have a dramatic effect? No.”

Another reason why the changes won’t be jarring is that a huge number of homebuyers are actually choosing five-year mortgages these days. A study issued by the Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals last month showed that fixed-rate mortgages accounted for 86 per cent of mortgages in set up in 2009 and, of those, 70 per cent were for a five-year term.

People who borrow to buy investment properties to either flip for a quick profit or to generate income are also affected by Tuesday’s announcement. If you buy a property you’re not going to live in, then you’ll have to put down a minimum 20 per cent to qualify for mortgage insurance. That’s up from 5 per cent.

But Mr. Majthenyi said not all lenders even require clients to have mortgage insurance if they put 20 per cent down. He also said that stiff mortgage insurance premiums already discouraged people from putting 5 per cent down on an investment property.

“In my office of 10 brokers, I don’t think I know of one client we’ve processed on a high-ratio rental property,” he said.

The final mortgage change restricts the ability of existing homeowners to refinance their mortgages to take on more debt. The new ceiling is 90 per cent of the value of your home, compared to the current 95 per cent.

Mortgage broker Jas Grewal said one group that will be affected by this is recent buyers who made a small down payment and are struggling with high credit card balances and other debts. By folding these debts into their mortgage, they can reduce their interest rate from as high as 19 per cent down to something closer to 3 or 4 per cent.

“Let’s say you put 10 per cent down – if we go from 95 to 90 per cent, you’re not going to be able refinance,” Mr. Grewal said. “You’re going to have to wait until your house value goes up and gives you some equity.”

Source: Rob Carrick of the Globe and Mail (www.TheGlobeandMail.com)

Government of Canada Takes Action to Strengthen Housing Financing

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

The Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, today announced a number of measured steps to support the long-term stability of Canada’s housing market and continue to encourage home ownership for Canadians.

“Canada’s housing market is healthy, stable and supported by our country’s solid economic fundamentals,” said Minister Flaherty. “However, a key lesson of the global financial crisis is that early policy action can help prevent negative trends from developing.”

The Government will therefore adjust the rules for government-backed insured mortgages as follows:

  • Require that all borrowers meet the standards for a five-year fixed rate mortgage even if they choose a mortgage with a lower interest rate and shorter term. This initiative will help Canadians prepare for higher interest rates in the future.
  • Lower the maximum amount Canadians can withdraw in refinancing their mortgages to 90 per cent from 95 per cent of the value of their homes. This will help ensure home ownership is a more effective way to save.
  • Require a minimum down payment of 20 per cent for government-backed mortgage insurance on non-owner-occupied properties purchased for speculation.

“There’s no clear evidence of a housing bubble, but we’re taking proactive, prudent and cautious steps today to help prevent one. Our Government is acting to help prevent Canadian households from getting overextended, and acting to help prevent some lenders from facilitating it,” said Minister Flaherty. “If some lenders aren’t willing to act themselves, we will act. These measures demonstrate the Government is committed to taking action when necessary to support the long-term stability of a sector that is so vital to our economy and the financial well-being of Canadian families.”

These adjustments to the mortgage insurance guarantee framework are intended to come into force on April 19, 2010.

Source: Department of Finance Canada

If you are thinking of buying you need to buy now.  Call us today to get pre-approved for a mortgage and help you find that perfect home for you today. 780-634-8151

Mortgage Rule Change and Why You Need To Buy Now!

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

New-Mortgage-Rules

   New Mortgage Rules: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly

 On April 19 our government will lay down three major rule changes to “prevent” a housing-price bubble and keep homeowners from getting “overextended.”

Here is the official announcement from today:  Finance Department release

These new rules apply to government-backed insured mortgages only.

The Good:  5-Year Fixed Qualification Rates

  • The New Rule:  Borrowers will need to qualify using a 5-year fixed rate regardless of what term they choose.  If you want a 1.95% variable rate, for example, you will need to show that you can afford payments at a higher fixed rate, like 4.09%.
  • The Government’s Reasoning:  “This initiative will help Canadians prepare for higher interest rates in the future.”
  • The Effect: It will now be harder to qualify for a variable-rate mortgage, but not much harder. Most lenders already use three- or five-year mortgage rates to calculate a borrower’s debt service ratios.  For many discount lenders, this means the qualifying rate will go from something like 3.25% to 3.89%—not a huge difference.
  • The Verdict: A sound and necessary change–although many lenders already use similar guidelines.

The Bad:  90% Maximum Refinancing

  • The New Rule:  No longer will you be able to refinance your home to 95% of it’s value. 90% will be the new refinance maximum.
  • The Government’s Reasoning:  “This will help ensure home ownership is a more effective way to save.”
  • The Effect:  Borrowers will be less able to pay off high-interest debt with lower-cost mortgage money.  On the upside, this rule has the positive effect of keeping equity in the home (which is quite helpful when home prices fall). It also discourages homeowners from relying on home equity to bail themselves out when they accumulate debt.
  • The Verdict:  Bad…for people who need to restructure debt in an effort to pay more principal and less interest.  On the other hand, a 90% refinance limit is beneficial in that it deters people from racking up debt and using their homes as a proverbial ATM machine.

The Ugly:  80% Maximum Insured Financing On Rentals

  • The New Rule:  People buying non-owner occupied rental properties will need to put down 20% to get an insured mortgage, versus 5% previously.
  • The Government’s Reasoning: To reduce speculation.
  • The Effect:  The number of investors creating rental housing will drop notably. Investors will need to borrow down payment funds elsewhere (assuming it’s allowed) or use higher-cost non-insured lenders (like TDFS) to get 90% financing. Note: This rule does not apply to multi-unit owner-occupied homes with rental units (like duplexes and triplexes).
  • The Verdict:  Ugly.  How the government can go from 100% rental financing (17 months ago) to 80% today is confounding. The intent is understandable, but the government could have increased net worth requirements, increased Beacon minimums, tightened debt servicing guidelines, or limited the number of insured rental mortgages a person can qualify for. Instead, the solution was near-draconian, and it will have an effect on the rental stock in Canada. Will it cause a material rise in rents?  That’s a tough call, but it will definitely reduce the supply of rental units and limit Canadians’ investment options.

What to Expect:

  • Undoubtedly there will be a rush of applications to beat the April 19 deadline. 
  • The government says “Exceptions would be allowed after April 19 where they are needed to satisfy a binding purchase and sale, financing, or refinancing agreement entered into before April 19, 2010.”
  • The 80% rental rule will crush the income property financing business for some lenders and brokers.
  • If history is a guide, certain lenders will implement these guidelines early (i.e.  before April 19).

Interestingly, Minister Flaherty took a small jab at lenders in his release today, saying these rule changes are designed to “help prevent some lenders” from “facilitating” irresponsible lending. 

“If some lenders aren’t willing to act themselves, we will act,” said Flaherty.  That’s bold talk given that Canadian lenders have exceptionally low default rates, and already conform their mortgages to all existing government guidelines. Source: http://www.canadianmortgagetrends.com/

Call me today to get yourself pre-approved for a mortgage to help you buy a home before these changes come into effect. Our number is 780-634-8151

Edmonton Real Estate Statistics – February 15, 2010

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Hello and happy Family Day.  I hope that yesterday you also got to celebrate either Valentine’s Day or the Chinese New Year or both.

I was at the Western Canada Re/Max Conference last week.  It was great as I met some very interesting people from all over western Canada.  On individual was from Fort McMurray, and was told that things are starting to turn around in Fort McMurray,  people are working again, and projects that were put on hold are starting up again.

This supports the other rumours that I have been hearing that the oil patch in general was picking for 2010.  Now that is good news for Edmonton, as a large part of Edmonton’s population relies in one way or another from the Alberta oil and gas industry.

As of this morning there were 1,607 single family dwellings listed for sale in Edmonton proper.  In the last 30 days there has also been 478 single family dwellings sold in Edmonton proper.  This would give us a listing to sales ratio of 3.36:1, which is similar to what we had last week but below the 4:1 that is required for a neutral or balanced market.

With this kind of ratio I expect that there will be upward pressure on valuations.  Also as the rumours keep increasing that we will see some kind of interest rate hike sometime this year we can expect some of the buyers sitting on the fence will start to come out and start buying again.

Edmonton Real Estate Statistics- February 08, 2010

Monday, February 8th, 2010

 

tle_logo1

Well the market is not improving if you are a buyer, and good news if you’re a seller.  As of this morning there are 1,523 single family homes for sale in Edmonton proper.  In the last 30 days there was 460 single family dwellings sold.  That would give us a listing to sales ratio of 3.31:1 which is lower than last week.

A ratio below 4:1 always indicates that there is an increase on upward pressure on the valuations of homes.  This is the second week in a row that this ratio has been below the ration of 4:1 – as a matter of fact the ratio this week is even lower than last week.

This means you should expect valuations to rise.  If you are a buyer it is time to “get off the fence” and start looking now before you have to pay more for the same home you want to buy.

Please call me if you have any questions about this, or anything else related to Real Estate – I would love to help you out. (780) 634-8151

Team Leading Edge… Leading the way with extraordinary service

Real estate market surging

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Early signs indicate that Canada’s hot real estate market surged again in January. Among the cities to report data, sales rose an average of more than 60 per cent, and prices more than 14 per cent, from a year earlier in Toronto, Calgary, Edmonton and Ottawa, BMO Nesbitt Burns said. In Toronto, sales jumped 87 per cent and prices 19 per cent. Earlier this week, the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver reported that, excluding apartment properties, sales rose 141 per cent in January from a year earlier, and prices 19.5 per cent.

www.TheGlobeandMail.com

The data included on this website is deemed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate by the REALTORS® Association of Edmonton. The trademarks REALTOR®, REALTORS® and the REALTOR® logo are controlled by The Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) and identify real estate professionals who are members of CREA. Used under license.